Bradley Dean Bidgood appeals the district court’s margin order denying his mo *666 tion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Bidgood, No. CR-95-32 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.