U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Francis v. Ashcroft

Francis v. Ashcroft
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2002

Francis v. Ashcroft

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6435

EDGHILL LEO FRANCIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-02-129-AM)

Submitted: May 24, 2002 Decided: June 17, 2002

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edghill Leo Francis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Edghill Leo Francis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, in which he challenged conditions of his confinement, without prejudice.

Because Francis may amend his complaint to proceed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) rather than § 2241, the district court’s dismissal without prejudice is not a final order and is not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.2d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Therefore, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.