Branch v. City of Richmond
Branch v. City of Richmond
Opinion
Cathy B. Branch appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Branch’s employment discrimination action. * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no *537 reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Branch v. City of Richmond, No. CA-01-366-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The magistrate judge had jurisdiction to enter a final order pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 2001).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.