Jackson v. United States
Jackson v. United States
38 F. App'x 938
Jackson v. United States
Opinion
Doris Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1994) petition for a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. United States, Nos. CR-92-38 G; CA-01-634-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.