Clarke v. Attorney General Ofc
Clarke v. Attorney General Ofc
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1387
ARNOLD B. CLARKE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE; JUDGE KULP, Henrico County Court; COMMONWEALTH’S ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-02-98)
Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 25, 2002
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnold B. Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Arnold B. Clarke appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clarke v. Attorney Gen. Office, No. CA-02-98 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.