Rice v. Dove
Rice v. Dove
40 F. App'x 834
Rice v. Dove
Opinion
James Robert Rice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rice v. Dove, No. CA-01-507-9-23 (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2002); see also San-Miguel v. Dove, 291 F.3d 257 (4th Cir. 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.