U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Vaughn v. SC Dept of Corr

Vaughn v. SC Dept of Corr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 24, 2002

Vaughn v. SC Dept of Corr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6451

EARNEST EDWARD VAUGHN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; MR. ADAMS, mail room employee; MR. RUMPH, mail room employee, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-00-3144)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earnest Edward Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE & O’ROURKE, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Earnest Edward Vaughn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Vaughn v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-00-3144 (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.