Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his motion in which he challenges the validity of his sentence after Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wilson, No. CA-95-49 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 28, 2002; entered Mar. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.