Bouknight v. Columbia Hotel Assoc
Bouknight v. Columbia Hotel Assoc
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1246
CLARITHA BOUKNIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
COLUMBIA HOTEL ASSOCIATES, d/b/a Sheraton Hotel; INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-00-896-17-3)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claritha Bouknight, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pedrick McWilliams, NEXSEN, PRUET, JACOBS & POLLARD, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Claritha Bouknight appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for a new trial following a jury verdict in favor of Columbia Hotel Associates and Interstate Management and Investment Corp. on her hostile work environment claims arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bouknight v. Columbia Hotel Assocs., No. CA-00-896-17-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 29 & Dec. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.