U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Frost v. Lee

Frost v. Lee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 1, 2002 · Wilkins, Motz, Traxler
42 F. App'x 616

Frost v. Lee

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Frost appeals the district court’s order denying several discovery motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.