Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order forfeiting substitute assets and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Riley, No. CR-98-101 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2002; Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *597 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.