U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Brown v. Director Dept Corr

Brown v. Director Dept Corr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 2002

Brown v. Director Dept Corr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6091

RONALD JEFFREY BROWN, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-01-405-3)

Submitted: July 15, 2002 Decided: August 5, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Adam Adamski, ADAMSKI & CONTI, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ronald Jeffrey Brown, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Director Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-405-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 13, 2001). We deny Brown’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.