U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

DeTemple v. Panepinto

DeTemple v. Panepinto
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 23, 2002

DeTemple v. Panepinto

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2408

In Re: GARY L. DETEMPLE, Debtor.

GARY L. DETEMPLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MARK D. PANEPINTO, successor to United National Bank, successor to Fed One Bank; UNITED NATIONAL BANK; WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND REVENUE; B. K. WATTS, Unit Manager, Internal Auditing Division, in his individual capacity; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; RITA R. VALDRINI, in her individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees, and

DEBRA A. WERTMAN, Trustee, Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-63-5, BK-99-5086)

Submitted: July 31, 2002 Decided: August 23, 2002 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary L. DeTemple, Appellant Pro Se. Mark D. Panepinto, Wheeling, West Virginia; George James Anetakis, Weirton, West Virginia; David L. Bissett, Joseph M. Palmer, B. K. Watts, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia; Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Gary L. DeTemple appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his complaint. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

DeTemple v. Panepinto, Nos. CA-00-63-5; BK-99-5086 (N.D.W. Va. Oct.

9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.