U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Forbes v. Dove

Forbes v. Dove
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 2002 · Niemeyer, Luttig, Williams
42 F. App'x 660

Forbes v. Dove

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Oranie Galindo Forbes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Forbes v. Dove, CA-01-30-7-24BG (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.