U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Sizemore v. Williamson

Sizemore v. Williamson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 30, 2002

Sizemore v. Williamson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6682

RAY DERWOOD SIZEMORE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MARK WILLIAMSON, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-99-1105-1)

Submitted: August 20, 2002 Decided: August 30, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ray Derwood Sizemore, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ray Derwood Sizemore appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find that Sizemore has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Sizemore v. Williamson, No. CA-99-1105-1 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.