U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

United States v. Lafity

United States v. Lafity
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 5, 2002 · Widener, Michael, Hamilton
45 F. App'x 270

United States v. Lafity

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Lafity appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for grand jury minutes. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lafity, No. CR-93-18 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.