Clarence Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for recon *258 sideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. CA-99-683 (E.D.Va. May 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.