U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Todd v. Llewellyn

Todd v. Llewellyn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 11, 2002

Todd v. Llewellyn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7068

RICK TODD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PATTI LLEWELLYN; CINDY TINKHAM, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-313)

Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rick Todd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Rick Todd appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Todd v. Llewellyn, No. CA-02-313 (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2002). We deny Todd’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.