Charles T. Sherwin appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion and motion for correction of the docket. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion because the matters Sherwin seeks to challenge became final in 1995, and there is no basis for reopening the case at this late date. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED