Harold Grammer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion *722 filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Grammer has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Grammer v. United States, No. CA-01-2750-2 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.