Edmonds v. Grissom

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit September 27, 2002

Edmonds v. Grissom, 46 F. App'x 712 (4th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Luther C. Edmonds appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to *713 reconsider prior orders dismissing his civil action and imposing sanctions against him. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Grissom, No. CA-98-488 (E.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Luther C. EDMONDS, Movant Appellant, and Elite Child, Incorporated; Sherry D. Battle, Plaintiffs, v. E. Preston GRISSOM, Individually and in His Capacity of Judge, Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Chesapeake, Defendant-Appellee, and Schroder Chesapeake, Incorporated, T/A Greenbrier Mall, Defendant
Status: Unpublished