Carter v. State of Virginia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Carter v. State of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1836

KENNETH O. CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF VIRGINIA, Government Employer Fault Liable; LAWSUIT RECIPIENT AND REPRESENTATIVE FOR STATE OF VIRGINIA GOVERNMENT, Attorney General, Jerry W. Kilgore; GROUNDS FOR DEFENDANT FAULT LIABLE IS EMPLOYEE MISUSE OF LAW AUTHORITY CAUSE PLAINTIFF,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 02-1839

KENNETH O. CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JACK GOLDBERG, a/k/a Jake Goldberg; LAWSUIT RECIPIENT AND REPRESENTATIVE FOR STATE OF VIRGINIA GOVERNMENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, JERRY W. KILGORE; GROUNDS FOR COMPENSATION DEFENDANT'S MISUSE OF LAW AUTHORITY CAUSE PLAINTIFF,

Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-18-4, CA-02-17)

Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth O. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Kenneth O. Carter seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(West Supp. 2001) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the

district court. See Carter v. State of Virginia, No. CA-02-18-4

(E.D. Va. July 25, 2002); Carter v. Goldberg, No. CA-02-17 (E.D.

Va. July 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished