Wilson v. State of Virginia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wilson v. State of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6785

RONALD WILSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF VIRGINIA, and all other employees of the state and its agents; WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON, Medical Department (in whole); B. COPE, Nurse; SERGEANT ELOM; NURSE HORSLEY; C. WILSON, Doctor; SERGEANT FARRISH; S. YOUNG, Warden; A. HARVEY, Assistant Warden; JANE DOE, #2, Nurse; JANE DOE, #3, Nurse; DOCTOR HOWARD; NURSE JOHNSON; JOHN DOE, #4, Doctor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-966-7)

Submitted: September 16, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Marie Kofron, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia; Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Wilson v. Virginia, No. CA-00-966-7 (W.D. Va. May 6,

2002). We deny Wilson’s motion for appointment of counsel as this

matter involves no complex issues or exceptional circumstances. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished