U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Almond v. Baskerville

Almond v. Baskerville
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2002 · Wilkins, Traxler, Gregory
47 F. App'x 665

Almond v. Baskerville

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Orlando David Amond seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the magistrate judge that Amond has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. * See Almond v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-230-3 (E.D.Va. May 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.