U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Scott v. Lee

Scott v. Lee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 17, 2002

Scott v. Lee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6997

AUBREY D. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DR. JAMES LEE, M.D.; DR. GERALO JORDON, Surgeon; DR. LEONARD J. WEIRETER, Surgeon, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 02-7004

AUBREY D. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DR. JAMES LEE, M.D.; DR. GERALO JORDON, Surgeon; DR. LEONARD J. WEIRETER, Surgeon, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-757-3) Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 17, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aubrey D. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Aubrey D. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scott v. Lee, No. CA-01-757-3 (E.D. Va. May 30, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.