Anderson v. United States Parole Commission
Anderson v. United States Parole Commission
48 F. App'x 92
Anderson v. United States Parole Commission
Opinion
Ricky Lee Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. United States, No. CA-02-670-2-23 (D.S.C. June 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.