Ogden v. Mayor and City Cncl

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ogden v. Mayor and City Cncl

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1307

ALLEN OGDEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, a Municipal Corporation; RONALD DANIELS, Acting Commissioner Baltimore City Police Department; STEVEN MCMAHAN, Major, Individually and in his official capacity; CARL BROWN, Major, Individually and in his official capacity; THOMAS MARCUZZI, Detective, Individually and in his official capacity; RONALD BURGER, Sergeant, Individually and in his official capacity; JAMES KELLER, Sergeant, Individually and in his official capacity; PATRICK ROWE, a/k/a Scotty, Individually and in his official capacity; TIMOTHY GODWINN, Officer, Individually and in his official capacity; WILLIAM KING, Officer, Individually and in his official capacity; JOHN JACKSON, Officer, Individually and in his official capacity; THE STATE OF MARYLAND; EDWARD T. NORRIS, JR., Commissioner,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 579-L)

Submitted: August 27, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allen Ogden, Appellant Pro Se. William Rowe Phelan, Jr, CITY OF BALTIMORE LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland; Patricia Anne Smith, BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Allen Ogden appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Ogden v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, No. CA-

00-579-L (D. Md. Feb. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished