Martin v. Clinchfield Coal Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Martin v. Clinchfield Coal Co., 48 F. App'x 75 (4th Cir. 2002)

Martin v. Clinchfield Coal Co.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gussie Martin seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Martin v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 01-644-BLA (BRB June 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gussie MARTIN, Petitioner, v. CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents
Status
Unpublished