Norfleet v. United States
Norfleet v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1686
COBURN T. NORFLEET,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-57-BR)
Submitted: October 11, 2002 Decided: October 25, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Coburn T. Norfleet, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Dudeck, Jr., Jonathan D. Carroll, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Coburn T. Norfleet appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his petition to quash six administrative summonses
pursuant to
26 U.S.C. § 7609(2000). Our review of the record and
the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Norfleet v. United States, No. CA-02-57-BR (E.D.N.C. May 22, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished