Duncan v. Miro
Opinion
Gene M. Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Duncan v. Miro, No. CA-01-2410-2-23 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Gene M. DUNCAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Geraldine MIRO, Warden; Charles M. Condon, South Carolina Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished