Hagan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co.
Opinion
Robert Hagan seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s award and computation of benefits pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 2001 & Supp. 2002). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Hagan v. Smith, BRB No. 01-586 (B.R.B. Apr. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are'adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert R. HAGAN, Petitioner, v. COOPER/T. SMITH STEVEDORING COMPANY; I.T.O. Corporation; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents
- Status
- Unpublished