Hagan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hagan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co., 48 F. App'x 885 (4th Cir. 2002)

Hagan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Hagan seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s award and computation of benefits pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 2001 & Supp. 2002). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Hagan v. Smith, BRB No. 01-586 (B.R.B. Apr. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are'adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert R. HAGAN, Petitioner, v. COOPER/T. SMITH STEVEDORING COMPANY; I.T.O. Corporation; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents
Status
Unpublished