Whitmore v. Condon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Whitmore v. Condon, 48 F. App'x 99 (4th Cir. 2002)

Whitmore v. Condon

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kedric Lamar Whitmore appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and conclude that Whitmore has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Whitmore v. Condon, No. CA-01-4407-3-24BC (D.S.C. July 31, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Kedric Lamar WHITMORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles Molony CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondent-Appellee
Status
Unpublished