Elliott v. Geise
Opinion
Damon Emmanuel Elliott appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to allege specific facts supporting his claims as instructed by the court’s prior order. Because Elliott may be able to proceed with this action by amending his complaint to allege sufficient facts to state a claim, the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Damon Emanuel ELLIOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Vincent GEISE; Rangarath Manthripragada; Pamela Cochran, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished