United States v. Milloway
United States v. Milloway
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7217
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LESTER LEROY MILLOWAY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-98, CA-01-74-7-F)
Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lester Leroy Milloway, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lester Leroy Milloway seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons
stated by the district court that Milloway has not made a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See
United States v. Milloway, Nos. CR-97-98; CA-01-74-7-F (E.D.N.C.
July 25, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
and dismiss the appeal. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished