UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6705

TYRONE SHELTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE; GENE M. JOHNSON, Deputy Director of the VDOC; GARY BASS, Chief of Operations for the VDOC; RICHARD A. YOUNG, Western Regional Director for the VDOC; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden for Red Onion State Prison; YVONNE ELSWICK, Assistant Warden of Programs, ROSP; OPERATIONS OFFICER FOR ROSP; J. BENTLEY, Treatment Program Supervisor at ROSP; R. ROWLETTE, Major, Chief of Security at ROSP; L. FLEMING, Captain of Security of ROSP; D. TAYLOR, Captain of Security at Wallens Ridge State Prison; R. PIENTKA, Sergeant; M. MULLINS; DOCTOR NWAUCHE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (CA-99-750-7)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; David Ernest Boelzner, Heather Marie Kofron, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Shelton appeals the magistrate judge’s and district

court’s orders denying relief in part on his

(2000) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate

judge’s and district court’s orders and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge and

district court. See Shelton v. Angelone, No. CA-99-750-7 (W.D. Va.

Sept. 8, 2000; Mar. 22, 2001; filed Mar. 27, 2002 and entered Mar.

28, 2002). In addition, we note that the district court’s opinion

on Shelton’s ADA claim is consistent with our recent decision in

Wessel v. Glendening, F.3d ,

(4th Cir.

Sept. 26, 2002) (No. 00-6634). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to

(c) (2000).

3