Powell v. St Paul Police Dept

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Powell v. St Paul Police Dept

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1886

KAREN DISHMAN POWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ST. PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT; ALLEN PORTER; GEORGE ROBINSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-27-2)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karen Dishman Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Roger Thiessen, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Karen Dishman Powell appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Powell v. St. Paul Police Dep’t, No. CA-01-27-2

(W.D. Va. July 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished