Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head
Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1629
HEIKO WILLIAM SUNKLER; MICHELLE HERRON SUNKLER,
Plaintiff - Appellants,
versus
TOWN OF NAGS HEAD, Town of Nags Head, North Carolina; BRYAN R. SEAWELL, Individually and as a Nags Head Building Inspector; COURTNEY N. GALLOP, Individually and as a Nags Head Zoning Administrator; GARY R. FERGUSON, Individually and as Planning Director for the Town of Nags Head,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-01-22-H)
Submitted: October 28, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002
Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael B. Brough, THE BROUGH LAW FIRM, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellants. L. P. Hornthal, Jr., HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Heiko William Sunkler and Michelle Herron Sunkler appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on their
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sunkler v. Town
of Nags Head, No. CA-01-22-H (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished