Donald Wardrick appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wardrick, Nos. CR-95-294; CA-99-3381PJM (D. Md. June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.