Kenneth Michael Plymale seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude based on the reasons stated by the district court and the magistrate judge that Ply-male has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Plymale v. Markle, No. CA-02-2-CVB (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 20, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.