Mulazim v. Angelone
Mulazim v. Angelone
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7174
AHOTO TAYSIR MULAZIM, a/k/a Harold Carpenter,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
KEVIN CANADA; JASON HILLYARD; ANTONIO JOHNSON; KHALID MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Antonio Waddler; LONNIE MCDONOVAN GHOLSON; CHRISTOPHER TINKER; ARTHUR D. NEWBY; DAMIEON CARTER; DENNIS BOYD,
Plaintiffs,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE; GENE M. JOHNSON; LINDA SHEAR, Head Dietician, Virginia Department of Corrections; DAN BRAXTON, Chief Warden; JOHN ARMENTROUT, Assistant Warden of Operations, Red Onion; R. W. FLEMING, Chief of Security, Red Onion; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTIGATOR YATES; L. MULLINS, Treatment Program Supervisor, Red Onion; V. PHIPPS, Director of Nursing, Red Onion; D. MCKNIGHT; P. SAUL, Human Rights Advocate, Red Onion; A. FLEENOR, Human Rights Advocate, Red Onion; RICHARD A. YOUNG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-557-7)
Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 14, 2002 2 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ahoto Taysir Mulazim, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ahoto Taysir Mulazim appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint without prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). Because Mulazim may cure any
deficiency by filing an amended complaint, we dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction, because the judgment is not a final,
appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local
Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67(4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with
oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished