After his conviction for being a felon in possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2000), James A. Liver-man, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying Liverman’s motion to dismiss the indictment. * Liverman claims the indictment pursuant to § 922(g) violated his rights under the Commerce Clause. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. As the district court correctly concluded, Liverman’s claim is foreclosed by our decisions in United States v. Gallimore, 247 F.3d 134 (4th Cir. 2001), and United States v. Wells, 98 F.3d 808 (4th Cir. 1996). It is well established that a panel of this court cannot overrule the decision of another panel. United States v. Najjar, 300 F.3d 466, 486 n. 8 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.