Akbar v. Director of North Carolina Prisons
Akbar v. Director of North Carolina Prisons
Opinion
Karim Abdul Akbar appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Akbar v. Director of North Carolina Prisons, No. CA-98-361-5-F (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 27, 2002; entered Mar. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We decline to address Akbar's ciaun under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-274, 114 Stat. 803, because this claim was not properly presented to the district court and Akbar has not averred, much less demonstrated, that plain error or a miscarriage of justice will result from the failure to review it. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.