United States v. Hadrick
Opinion
Jonathan Wayne Hadrick appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he alleged prosecutorial misconduct in his criminal trial. Hadrick improperly invoked the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to collaterally attack a criminal judgment. United States v. O’Keefe, 169 F.3d 281, 289 (5th Cir. 1999) (citing United States v. Mosavi, 138 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1998)). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan Wayne HADRICK, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished