Widney Trevor Dinnall appeals the district court’s fourth order forfeiting substitute assets. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Dinnall, No. CR-98-946-DWS (D.S.C. filed May 1, 2002; entered May 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.