Phelps v. Beeler
Opinion
Coy Ray Phelps appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Phelps v. Beeler, No. CA-02-598-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 4, 2002 & entered Sept. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Coy Ray PHELPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Art BEELER, Respondent-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished