U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Mohamed v. Frye

Mohamed v. Frye
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 4, 2002

Mohamed v. Frye

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7487

HAKEEM MUSTAFA ALI MOHAMED, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DEPUTY FRYE, #8825, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-682-2)

Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 4, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hakeem Mustafa Ali Mohamed, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Hakeem Mustafa Ali Mohamed appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Mohamed v. Frye, No. CA-02-682-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 5, 2002; entered Sept. 6, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.