Jonathan Edwards appeals from the district’s order denying his “Motion to Reopen,” in which he asserts that he should not have been sentenced as an armed career criminal for his 1993 conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2000). Edwards faded to raise this issue in his direct criminal appeal. Moreover, the time for seeking post-conviction relief has long since expired. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). Consequently, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.