Beckwith v. Giroux
Opinion
Richard Lewis Beckwith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court that Beckwith has not exhausted administrative remedies with respect to Ms Bivens claims. * See Beckwith v. Giroux, No. CA-02-1799 (D. Md. filed Aug. 8, 2002 & entered Aug. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Beckwith abandoned his remaining claims on appeal. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Richard Lewis BECKWITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Virginia GIROUX; Klimkiewicz, Physician’s Assistant; Doctor Moubarek, Clinical Director; Isam Elyan; Dawn Williams, R.N.; Jody Amezcua, R.N.; Lisa Dudek, R.N.; Jane Doe(s), # 1-25; John Doe(s), # 1-25, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished