Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail
Opinion
Dwayne Anthony Hairston appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail, No. CV-02-1018-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dwayne Anthony HAIRSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTINSVILLE CITY JAIL; Steve Draper, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished