U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2002

Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail

Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 13, 2002 · Wilkins, Luttig, Traxler
52 F. App'x 629

Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Anthony Hairston appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail, No. CV-02-1018-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.