Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail
Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail
52 F. App'x 629
Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail
Opinion
Dwayne Anthony Hairston appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hairston v. Martinsville City Jail, No. CV-02-1018-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.